Relevant evidence is admissible unless any of the following provides otherwise: Irrelevant evidence is not admissible. Summary and Explanation Federal Rule of Evidence 402 establishes the fundamental principles regarding the admissibility of evidence in United States federal courts. This rule is a key component of the Federal Rules of Evidence. The main points of Rule […]
Rule 402 – General Admissibility of Relevant Evidence Read More »
(a) To Courts and Judges. These rules apply to proceedings before: United States district courts; United States bankruptcy and magistrate judges; United States courts of appeals; the United States Court of Federal Claims; and the district courts of Guam, the Virgin Islands, and the Northern Mariana Islands. (b) To Cases and Proceedings. These rules apply
Rule 1101 – Applicability of the Rules Read More »
» Purchase the Federal Rules of Evidence 2024 Edition Book for $9.99 ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS ARTICLE II. JUDICIAL NOTICE ARTICLE III. PRESUMPTIONS IN CIVIL CASES ARTICLE IV. RELEVANCE AND ITS LIMITS ARTICLE V. PRIVILEGES ARTICLE VI. WITNESSES ARTICLE VII. OPINIONS AND EXPERT TESTIMONY ARTICLE VIII. HEARSAY ARTICLE IX. AUTHENTICATION AND IDENTIFICATION ARTICLE X. CONTENTS
(a) Prohibited Uses. The following evidence is not admissible in a civil or criminal proceeding involving alleged sexual misconduct: (1) evidence offered to prove that a victim engaged in other sexual behavior; or (2) evidence offered to prove a victim’s sexual predisposition. (b) Exceptions. (1) Criminal Cases. The court may admit the following evidence in
Rule 412 – Sex-Offense Cases: The Victim’s Sexual Behavior or Predisposition Read More »
Evidence that a person was or was not insured against liability is not admissible to prove whether the person acted negligently or otherwise wrongfully. But the court may admit this evidence for another purpose, such as proving a witness’s bias or prejudice or proving agency, ownership, or control. Summary and Explanation Federal Rule of Evidence
Rule 411 – Liability Insurance Read More »
(a) Prohibited Uses. Evidence of the following is not admissible — on behalf of any party — either to prove or disprove the validity or amount of a disputed claim or to impeach by a prior inconsistent statement or a contradiction: (1) furnishing, promising, or offering — or accepting, promising to accept, or offering to
Rule 408 – Compromise Offers and Negotiations Read More »
When measures are taken that would have made an earlier injury or harm less likely to occur, evidence of the subsequent measures is not admissible to prove: But the court may admit this evidence for another purpose, such as impeachment or — if disputed — proving ownership, control, or the feasibility of precautionary measures. Summary
Rule 407 – Subsequent Remedial Measures Read More »
The court may exclude relevant evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by a danger of one or more of the following: unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, misleading the jury, undue delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative evidence. Summary and Explanation Federal Rule of Evidence 403 provides guidelines for excluding relevant evidence in
Evidence is relevant if: (a) it has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence; and (b) the fact is of consequence in determining the action. Summary and Explanation Federal Rule of Evidence 401 defines what constitutes relevant evidence in a legal proceeding. This rule is
Rule 401 – Test for Relevant Evidence Read More »
